Skip to content
Sarathiಸಾರಥಿ
HomeHow to useLabelsSourcesWhat’s ready
Home / Bus + Metro + walking
Multimodal journey planning

One trip can use more than one Bengaluru network.

Sarathi is designed to compare BMTC buses, Namma Metro and walking as a single door-to-door journey. It keeps transfer cost, access walks and a useful direct bus visible instead of reducing the trip to one “best” line.

Updated 7 September 2026
On this pagePlain answerWhole journeyFive viewsDirect busWalkingTruth labelsExample

Can Sarathi combine bus, Metro and walking?

Yes. Sarathi’s planning model is built to combine BMTC bus legs, Namma Metro legs and the walking needed to reach, transfer between and leave those services. It also compares multimodal options against simpler alternatives such as a direct bus.

1. The whole journey matters

A Metro ride can look fast while the station access and interchange make the door-to-door trip slower. A direct bus can look slow while avoiding a transfer makes it easier. Sarathi is intended to show walk, wait, ride and transfer in the same journey card so the trade-off is visible.

For the underlying networks, see the Bengaluru public transport guide.

2. Five planner views, not one score

Sarathi keeps Fastest, Shortest route, Likely cheapest, Fewest changes and Direct bus available as separate views. These labels describe planning objectives, not guarantees.

  • Fastest favours overall journey time.
  • Shortest route favours route distance.
  • Likely cheapest is a ranking only; Sarathi does not show actual fare amounts.
  • Fewest changes favours fewer transfers.
  • Direct bus preserves a one-seat option when the dataset supports one.

3. Why retain the direct bus?

Some travellers prefer a one-seat ride even when another option is a few minutes faster. By keeping a direct BMTC option visible, Sarathi avoids making the optimisation decision on the traveller’s behalf.

The BMTC bus journey planner guide explains how direction, stop order and scheduled times fit around that direct option.

4. Walking is a transport leg too

Sarathi uses an OpenStreetMap-derived Bengaluru walking graph prepared for OpenTripPlanner. The purpose is to count the walk to a stop or station and the walk after alighting, rather than pretending transit begins and ends exactly at a platform or bus stop.

A slightly farther stop may offer a better direct service. A nearby Metro station may be less useful than a bus corridor. Door-to-door comparison makes those choices explicit.

5. Scheduled and Live are different facts

Every time carries a truth state: Scheduled, Typical, Cached, Live or Unavailable. Timetable values stay Scheduled. Sarathi does not promote a timetable to “live” merely because it is recent.

Read Data freshness and time labels for the methodology and Data sources for provenance.

6. Koramangala to the MG Road side

The public product story uses Sony World 80ft Road, Koramangala → Mayohall to show how alternatives can coexist. A 141-K direct bus stays visible while a G-2 option can connect toward Trinity and the Purple Line. The goal is to show the trade-off; it is not a guarantee that the same service state will apply when you travel.

Sarathi is independent of BMTC and BMRCL. Confirm vehicle, direction, service changes and fare with the operator while travelling.
Sarathi · ಸಾರಥಿ

An independent companion for Bengaluru bus, Metro and walking journeys. Not affiliated with BMTC or BMRCL.

Sarathi — a product of AUMLayer Cloud Labs LLP

Website
aumlayer.com
Email
[email protected]
Phone
+91 81510 39365

Journey guides

Bengaluru public transportBMTC bus plannerNamma Metro plannerBus + Metro + walking

Trust

Data freshnessData labelsData sourcesAbout

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms and ConditionsHow to use
© AUMLayer Cloud Labs LLP. All rights reserved.No advertising cookies on this site · Not affiliated with BMTC or BMRCL